Wed, 08 September 2010  15:22:49
Forex Loss 3 Comment(s)
14 Jul, 2009 07:13:33
Sri Lanka Nations Trust Bank loses Rs800mn on forex bet
July 14, 2009 (LBO) - Sri Lanka's Nations Trust Bank, a unit of John Keells Holdings has lost 800 million rupees on a forex bet, but the bank had ended the June 2009 quarter with a 150 million rupees in the black with bond trading profits, its interim results showed.
In the June quarter the bank showed an 800.3 million forex loss and 1,214 million rupees of other income, which covered the gap.

The bank said the forex bet came "from a breach in operating procedure" in its foreign currency banking unit and risk management has since been tightened.

"The aggressive provisioning in the first half, coupled with further tightening of risk management measures, means that we have cleared the decks and placed the bank in a strong position to propel ourselves for greater growth in the next half," chief executive Zulfiqar Zavahir said in a statement.

Sri Lanka's government securities rates plummeted in the first quarter from around 20.0 percent to 13.0 percent, giving holders of government bonds chance for large capital gains.

NTB showed government securities of 12.0 billion in its trading portfolio by end-June (up from 8.0 billion in December). The accounts showed funding of 12.7 billion through repurchase deals.

The bank also had 10.6 billion in government securities in the held-to-maturity stock, up from 7.3 billion in December.

Its performing loan book grew at a slow 3.0 percent to end at 42.7 billion rupees. Most banks had chosen to finance the government, rather than the private sector as the economy weakened.

Loan loss provisions rose 77.0 percent to 467 million rupees. Group net non-performing ratio rose to 3.7 percent in June from 1.8 percent in December.

Group interest income grew 15.0 percent to 3.2 billion; interest expense grew 9.0 percent to 3.2 billion rupees allowing net interest income to grow at a faster 31.0 percent.

Deposits grew by 29.0 percent to 44.2 billion rupees.

Zavahir said the bank was expanding into the north and east with fresh branches to be opened in the next six months.

Group gross assets grew 11.0 percent to 75.2 billion rupees while net assets grew 2.0 percent to 4.4 billion. At bank level net assets were 3.8 billion rupees and it had total capital adequacy of 13.04 percent, (down from 15.2 percent in December) above regulatory requirements.

Bookmark and Share
 
READER COMMENT(S)
3. Treasury Jul 15
Shocking!!! Management allowing a business unit to accumulate such a colossal amount in Forex loss. Isn't there a daily revaluation process, Stop loss limits, Trading limits?

Isn't there a Treasury back office in NTB who should process the Forex Transactions and report? What was the internal audit doing? whole lot of departments and heads of the department must be held accountable at NTB.

2. Analyst Jul 15
If NTB had to sell the held to maturity government securities to make a compensating profit they will lose the future income from this portfolio as they will have to invest the cash they got at current low interest rates for government securities.

Has any analyst calculated the impact on future interest margin of NTB. Shouldn't NTB disclose this information for public dissemination.

1. Concerned Investor Jul 14
How is a regulated commercial bank allowed to make a 'forex bet' that has resulted in the bank losing SLRs800 mn? The bank's 2008 net profit was only SLRs593 mn. Does not the Central Bank limit trading in forex?

Thanks to the steep decline in interest rates in 2009, capital gains on long term TBonds have compensated for the forex loss, but surely this is an unacceptable level of risk for a commercial bank to take on?

It appears foolhardy to over-depend on volatile 'trading' income streams such as those from fixed income trading and forex trading in the quest to boost short term profits and returns.

NTB has a duty to explain more fully the 'breach in operating procedures in the FCBU' that gave rise to this forex loss, and action taken to prevent such a recurrence in the future. Who in top management has accepted responsibility for this incident?