| Change is bad
The whole point of time standardization is simplicity. When the 24 time zones were established in 1883, the idea was that each zone would differ from the next by one full hour. But of course, it did not translate into practice as neatly as intended.
For example Bombay continued to be 39 minutes behind IST until 1955. But in those days, it is possible that no one noticed the difference, because nothing may have happened on time either in Bombay or in the rest of India.
And even after 1955, the whole of India has been 5 ½ hours off UTC and not a nice round number like most other countries.
Who are the members of the peculiar-time-difference club that we will join in April if the President's idea is implemented?
Afghanistan UTC+4:30
Chatham Island (New Zealand) UTC+12:45
Cocos (Keeling) Islands (Australia) UTC+6:30
India UTC+5:30
Iran UTC+3:30
Marquesas Islands (French Polynesia) UTC+13:30
Myanmar UTC+8:30
Nepal UTC+9:15
Norfolk Island (Australia) UTC+12:30
In addition, there is Newfoundland, a part of Canada's poorest province stuck in the middle of the Atlantic (UTC-3:30) and the rather empty middle of Australia (Northern Territory UTC+9:30 and Southern Australia UTC+10:30). It is not known whether the food habits of cows were the determining factor in these peculiarities.
|
There may be one or two little islands that may have been missed, but
this is the membership of the club that we will be joining in April.
Even little Bhutan, which is strongly integrated with India, is in the
mainstream, keeping its time at UTC+6 (along with Sri Lanka and
Bangladesh). |
There may be one or two little islands that may have been missed, but this is the membership of the club that we will be joining in April. Even little Bhutan, which is strongly integrated with India, is in the mainstream, keeping its time at UTC+6 (along with Sri Lanka and Bangladesh).
The only significant economies within the peculiar-time-difference club are India, Iran and Myanmar, and of course some weight has to be given to the middle of Australia. But it seems clear that almost all the world's countries maintain round-hour time differences.
If we wish to attract investment, engage in trade, and otherwise engage with the global economy (not only the Indian economy) there appears to be merit in staying in the mainstream.
There is also the problem of the signals given by making periodic and peculiar changes. We changed the time once in 1996 and now we are changing it again. That contributes to an image or quirkiness and oddity, which we could do without.
Even if something is bad, like the unpronounceable-to-foreigners name of our international airport, it is best that we do not change it every ten years but simply use the abbreviation only or a convenient shortened form such as Banda International Airport.
|