Empower your business in Sri Lanka and internationally with Prifinance expert corporate and financial services. Streamline company formation and investment opportunities with our tailored advice and solutions.

Sirimavo’s policies to develop local industry should have been continued: President

President-Maithripala-Sirisena

Aug 13, 2015 (LBO) – Sri Lanka’s economy would have developed if the country continued the policy of former Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranayake to develop local industries rather than import, the President said.
online pharmacy buy diflucan with best prices today in the USA

“If you take the island’s political era from 1956-65 and 70-71, priority was given to the local industrial economy,” President Maithripala Sirisena told a symposium of Sri Lanka Ceramic and Glass Association. “But with the introduction of open economy in 1977, the country absorbed all the good and bad things. All the local factories were affected and fell with the economy being open for imports.
buy tamiflu online https://yourolddog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/png/tamiflu.html no prescription pharmacy


buy cenforce online https://www.cappskids.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/png/cenforce.html no prescription pharmacy

Not only for ceramic and tiles, but the food made at home was imported. We still haven't got out of that situation,” he said.
online pharmacy buy abilify with best prices today in the USA


buy vilitra online https://yourolddog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/png/vilitra.html no prescription pharmacy



“Today, most of the stuff we buy from shops can be found locally and 75 to 80 percent of the food we eat is imported,” Pointing out an example President said, “When we started in 1970 – 77 to build the local economy through empowering local industries, people called the garments which were made locally as kerosene apparel (lamputhel Chiththa). But if we continued, we might have manufactured standard quality apparel now.” Analysts say Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s regime fall after her unprecedented nationalization in the early 1970s failed to achieve desired benefits and expected economic benefits. The Nationalization of private companies in Sri Lanka started in 1956 by the Sri Lanka Freedom Party led by nationalist sentiment. Most of the key businesses at the time were run by the state and by 1977 most of the companies were running at a loss. However, bureaucracy, political interference, lack of professionalism, managerial expertise, lack of capital and technology also led to making continous losses which ultimately increased the burden on the ordinary citizen.
online pharmacy buy spiriva inhaler with best prices today in the USA


buy doxycycline online https://www.cappskids.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/png/doxycycline.html no prescription pharmacy

After 1977, these policies were reversed under United National Party government which introduced the open economy policy and privatization was one of the key components. President Sirisena said when this policy came in to play in 1977, most of the local organizations were shut down. He said the nation with a proud economic history during Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa eras, now looks pale. “We are a nation with a proud history for not importing anything from outside shores to the country but producing locally for consumption,” President Sirisena said. “If you look at the vision of most developed countries in the world, they have maximized their local innovation and knowledge base to build more power. They boast about their national strengths,” “But we are on the other side of it. What we boast is the historical memory of us.
buy levofloxacin online https://yourolddog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/png/levofloxacin.html no prescription pharmacy

” President Sirisena said it is high time for a proper government strategy for the country to support local organization to push quality products and services. “Today we are in a mentality which asked quality products and services whether it’s locally or internationally produced,” “So, if we are to strengthen our economy, we have to make the right decisions. We should not cuddle or make friendship with the importers who import the same product that you produce locally. We should have a strategy to strengthen our local industries,” “As a government we have the ability to increase import taxes to protect local enterprises, but you should be able to produce high quality products and services for consumers,” “Your product quality should be improved and competitive enough and if so the Government will support you.”
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kalindu
kalindu
8 years ago

Superb story. I completely do agree with President Sirisena but those policies should have been continued with some freedom of open economy. you can not have economic development when people are hungry and craving for foods.

Tilak
Tilak
8 years ago

1)China basicaly a comunist country & is the worlds No2.( So rich it is the largest money lender to the US)
2)US a democratic freestyle country is the worlds no 1.
Why are we little down with a 99% literacy rate for so many years is a vital issue to ponder. Do we have a wealth gobbling machines that can buckle any system?

Disqust_ed
Disqust_ed
8 years ago
Reply to  Tilak

Tilak, How do you define US as #1 ? Based on what ?

Tilak
Tilak
8 years ago
Reply to  Disqust_ed

Two largest economies of the world.US 1 China 2, Managed by two very different political systems.Thus different sub systems.ie Reward & penaty for distroying public wealth /benifiting through curruption ,no2 targets the hiarachy often to send the message (ie plastic in milk, top officilals military men caught in curruption execution after trial,No 1 Swift trial long sentence for fraud.Richard Nixon banished,largest multinational banks billion dollar penalties for ratefixings, most markets monitored for manupulations & rutinely delt with sending clear messages.Grate freedom but no trampling on public freedom nor asstes.)

Niro
Niro
8 years ago

What BS! Sri Lankans will end up consuming low quality products at inflated prices. Good for few manufacturers but an utter loss to the general population.
Sirima style economics experiments have failed miserably in many countries including Sri Lanka with catastrophic economic consequences.

Nish
Nish
8 years ago

Sirimawo policies with Ranil Wickramasinghe? President you are one fine jorker.

Patriot
Patriot
8 years ago
Reply to  Nish

This President does not know whether he is coming or going. His main aim seems to migrate to the west or seek asylum in the west claiming he and his family would be killed etc. This is the same trick used by boat people fleeing to the west. He could get this wish, if he stops Rajapakse from becoming the next Prime Minister.

Attanagalla
Attanagalla
8 years ago

A country like Sri Lanka should have chosen the middle path, not to the extreme either way in terms of protecting local industries and importing essential goods. However, doors of open economy were banged open post 1977 UNP administration. I guess it was a shock to the nation at the time (not slow and steady), crooks were galore, made money at the expense of poor people. People respected law and order prior to 1977, then breaking the law became norm with the politicos leading the way. Ministers were driving on the wrong side of the road to get ahead, other drivers followed just to mention one. Now people talk about good governance but those who lived long enough would have witnessed where the pathetic errosion of law and order began. Without going into much details, UNP is responsible for the current lack of respect for law situation. What a mess. MS has been in the governing business long enough to realise all that yet partnering with so called good governance outfit, just for his own survival but nothing else. Remember MS, electorate is more educated now, you cannot fill them all the time.

john smith
john smith
8 years ago

In the modern world you don’t need to produce what you need locally just because you can. If it costs more to produce locally you import. You produce and export what your country can produce better and cheaper than what the rest of the world can. Everybody then effectively gets the best and cheapest product. The term in economics is you produce the product where you are at a “competitive advantage”.

kgeorgeVI
kgeorgeVI
8 years ago
Reply to  john smith

what to do we produce? Only thing in addition to three traditional crop is blue collar labor like housemaids and garments despite 80 years of higher education

john smith
john smith
8 years ago
Reply to  kgeorgeVI

Garments. Tourism. Possibly financial services. It’s up to investors to find suitable opportunities where we have a competitive advantage.

david
david
8 years ago
Reply to  john smith

Is that why the US and Europe gives farm subsidies?

http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba547 ->>

Subsidized agriculture in the developed world is one of the greatest obstacles to economic growth in the developing world.
In 2002, industrialized countries in the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) spent a total of $300 billion on crop
price supports, production payments and other farm programs. These
subsidies encourage overproduction. Markets are flooded with surplus
crops that are sold below the cost of production, depressing world
prices. Countries with unsubsidized goods are essentially shut out of
world markets, devastating their local economies. Moreover, farm
subsidies lead to environmental harm in rich and poor nations alike.

Prosperous
countries give about $50 billion to $55 billion annually in foreign aid
to underdeveloped nations. If developed nations reduced their subsidies
and eliminated trade barriers – such as import tariffs protecting
domestic producers from international competition – this aid would
arguably be unnecessary and rural poverty might be significantly
reduced. – See more at: http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba547#sthash.36UOLfHl.dpuf

Bandu Muthu
Bandu Muthu
8 years ago

Mr Sirisena, This is a bloody

Garawi
Garawi
8 years ago

But the way it was implemented was flawed. It was mostly nationalizing the manufacturing . These services were a den for polotical appointees and did not make any profit. Instead the local entrepreuner must be supported to produce locally.

Sugath
Sugath
8 years ago

During 70-77 era of Mrs Bandaranayake regime,private sector was discouraged from starting new industries. The local pioneers of activated carbon had to wait two years just to get permission to start the factory.

kgeorgeVI
kgeorgeVI
8 years ago

Came eta ata in 1977. all open economy did was enrich importers and increase the external debt by many many times. Luxury consumption by city folks, who do not contribute any thing to economy, on borrowed money

Patriot
Patriot
8 years ago

Sirisena is now the Trojan Horse of the anti Sri Lankan forces. He is trying to usher in a failed economic policy now rejected even by countries like India and China, which have accepted a mixed economic policy. He is also refusing to accept the people’s choice of a Prime Minister at the elections, if it is not his choice. He has already replaced the General Secretaries of the SLFP and UNFP illegally, while an election is on. It seems the rumours are true that he is desperate to achieve his personal goals for himself and his family in a foreign country pushing him to do these things, only done by a dictator?. However, he might end up impeached if he fails in his machinations to put UNP in power.

Roshan
Roshan
8 years ago
Reply to  Patriot

World history is full of fraudsters who destroyed their own countries and then fled to the countries that sponsored them. I’m starting to ponder the same about the current president. Certainly some super power is encouraging him to act like a dictator.

Top
18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x