Opinion: Helping Sri Lankan workers in South Korea save better
Janaka Wijayasiri
Sunil has been employed in South Korea for the last three and a half years, working for a Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) manufacturing automobile parts, in the industrial town of Ansan, in the outskirts of Seoul. He earns KRW 2.5 million or LKR 400,000 a month with overtime and night-shift allowances – a sizable income back in Sri Lanka. Having married a year ago, he came to Korea intending to earn as much as possible within a short time. He hopes to start a business upon his return to Sri Lanka and improve the well-being of his family.
Korea as a New Destination for Sri Lankan Migrants
Sunil
is amongst 28,000 Sri Lankan youth who have migrated to
Korea, temporarily, since 2014, under the Employment Permit System (EPS), to
work in manufacturing, construction and fisheries sectors – dirty, difficult,
and dangerous (3D) jobs in the SME sector from which most Koreans shy away.
EPS allows Korean employers, who have failed to recruit native Korean workers,
to legally hire an adequate number of foreign workers. Over the last decade or
so, Korea has emerged as a popular destination for labour sending countries
from the Asia-Pacific region. Between 2004 and 2015, more than 540,000
individuals, from 16 countries, have worked under the EPS. In fact, the EPS has
emerged to become the largest temporary foreign worker programme, operating on
a bilateral basis among OECD countries.
In
2017, 5,805 Sri Lankans have officially migrated to work in Korea, of which
more than 95 per cent were unskilled workers. Almost all the departures to
Korea from Sri Lanka are men, given the nature of the occupations available in
Korea. Factors such as higher-incomes, low pre-departure costs, no requirements
in terms of specific educational qualifications, skills or professional tests
apart from proficiency in basic Korean, and the issuance of time-bound, legally-accepted
working visa have encouraged Sri Lankans to seek employment in Korea. It now
ranks as the sixth-largest destination for foreign employment after Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Oman, and accounts for 3 per cent of the total
departures from Sri Lanka.
Expenses at the Destination
Like
most low skilled migrants from Sri Lanka, Sunil manages to save up a
substantial portion of his income and remits money home regularly through the
bank or a mobile application, which has become popular lately due to its ease
and convenience. His expenditure in Korea is low as his accommodation and food
are provided by his employer. This is a general practice, though, recently the
Korean government has allowed employers to deduct up to 20 per cent of the
salaries for accommodation and food. Moreover, the employer pays for utilities
at the company dormitory and insurances, which are mandatory under the EPS.
However, Sunil does have miscellaneous personal expenditures – payments for the
mobile phone and phone bills, outings with friends, clothes, transport – and
mandatory payments which include health insurances, pension, taxes, etc.
While
he has managed to save enough to fulfil his objectives of seeking employment
abroad, not all those who come to Korea can do so due to their frivolous
spending behaviour, often falling victim to alcoholism and returning to Sri
Lanka with little or no savings after their permitted stay in Korea. As Sunil
recounted, “Korea is a good country to work in, but people should come
here with an objective and should work towards meeting it, rather than engage
in wasteful activities.”
Ways to Help Migrants Maximise Savings
Given
the substantial savings remitted and mandatory payments each month – various
insurances, pension, taxes – the scope to further reduce their expenditure in
Korea may be limited for migrants. However, the temporary nature of migration
to Korea necessitates that policymakers in both home and host countries look at
ways to help migrants maximise savings during their stay abroad. The maximum
permitted stay under the EPS is two separate stints of four years and 10 months
each.
Financial
literacy programmes can
have an important influence on migrants’ financial decisions and practices.
Moreover, studies have shown that participation in programmes aimed at
improving the financial habits of migrants led to an increase savings and
remittances amongst those with low savings levels prior. The introduction of
financial education classes in the training programmes conducted in Sri Lanka
and Korea can improve migrants’ savings behaviour.
There
are various
social schemes in Korea, as well as in Sri Lanka, to ensure the welfare
of migrant workers; for example, Casualty Insurance in Korea and the Sri Lanka
Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE) registration fees in Sri Lanka, which
include insurance coverage. They provide similar benefits for which the migrant
has to pay before their departure and after their arrival in Korea, to SLBFE
and authorised insurance agent in Korea, respectively. These appear to be
duplicative in their objectives and could be rationalised to ensure that the costs
of migration are marginally reduced for Sri Lankan workers.
Other
approaches to reduce the cost of migration at the destination include
encouraging migrants to open a voluntary savings scheme, whereby a
portion of their income is automatically saved at a regular interval, so that a
reasonable level is accumulated by the time the migrant returns home for good.
As suggested by Sunil, “similar to setting up a Non-Resident Foreign
Currency (NRFC) account, they should open a facility whereby each month a small
amount is deducted from the salary and deposited in the account, so that after
a certain period of time, a sizable amount could be guaranteed by the bank,
providing an incentive for migrants to save.”
With one
more year remaining on his visa, Sunil is trying to figure out what to do when
he gets back to Sri Lanka to ensure that he has a steady flow of income. Having
lived outside of Sri Lanka for a while, he is unaware of what opportunities are
available in Sri Lanka and where to invest his hard-earned savings. He is
hopeful of starting a business and providing a better future for his family.
(Janaka Wijayasiri is a Research Fellow at the
Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (IPS). He also served as a Visiting
Fellow at the Korea Institute of International Economic Policy (KIEP), during
which time he studied the Costs of Low Skilled Migrants in South Korea. To talk
to the author, email janaka@ips.lk. To view this article online and to share your
comments, visit the IPS Blog ‘Talking Economics’ – http://www.ips.lk/talkingeconomics/)
